Talk:Open Source Projects: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Open Source Projects
(Questioning wisdom of keeping delta update times long term.)
(rearranging comments to be in chronological order with signatures after comments)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Updated (as of 'Date') ==
""[[User:iKy1e|iKy1e]]  ([[User talk:iKy1e|talk]]) 22:23, 28 August GMT""
Given the size of the list I'm questioning the wisdom of having every item in the list using a delta timestamp.
Every month, as most dates are accurate to the month, '''every''' Item will need to have it's delta updated.
If we switch now to using absolute dates then we only need the single switch now and then only a single project when one is updated?
== "Should it only be JB projects?" ==
== "Should it only be JB projects?" ==
'''[[User:AngelXwind|Karen Tsai (angelXwind)]] ([[User talk:AngelXwind|talk]]) 02:22, 21 August 2013 (PDT):''' To answer this curious editor's question:
To answer this curious editor's question:


The iPhone Dev Wiki is mostly jailbreak '''oriented''', but there isn't anything that specifically says that only jailbreak-related things can be documented in this wiki.
The iPhone Dev Wiki is mostly jailbreak '''oriented''', but there isn't anything that specifically says that only jailbreak-related things can be documented in this wiki.
Line 15: Line 7:


...That, and the fact that there are very little FOSS iOS apps (and the ones that exist are essentially dead)
...That, and the fact that there are very little FOSS iOS apps (and the ones that exist are essentially dead)
[[User:AngelXwind|Karen Tsai (angelXwind)]] ([[User talk:AngelXwind|talk]]) 02:22, 21 August 2013 (PDT)
== Updated (as of 'Date') ==
Given the size of the list I'm questioning the wisdom of having every item in the list using a delta timestamp.
Every month, as most dates are accurate to the month, '''every''' Item will need to have it's delta updated.
If we switch now to using absolute dates then we only need the single switch now and then only a single project when one is updated?
[[User:iKy1e|iKy1e]]  ([[User talk:iKy1e|talk]]) 22:23, 28 August GMT

Revision as of 22:11, 28 August 2013

"Should it only be JB projects?"

To answer this curious editor's question:

The iPhone Dev Wiki is mostly jailbreak oriented, but there isn't anything that specifically says that only jailbreak-related things can be documented in this wiki.

That being said, The iPhone Dev Wiki itself states that it is "The sum of all human knowledge about jailbroken iOS development," so I think we should still stick with only listing jailbroken FOSS projects.

...That, and the fact that there are very little FOSS iOS apps (and the ones that exist are essentially dead)

Karen Tsai (angelXwind) (talk) 02:22, 21 August 2013 (PDT)

Updated (as of 'Date')

Given the size of the list I'm questioning the wisdom of having every item in the list using a delta timestamp. Every month, as most dates are accurate to the month, every Item will need to have it's delta updated. If we switch now to using absolute dates then we only need the single switch now and then only a single project when one is updated?

iKy1e (talk) 22:23, 28 August GMT