(→Updated (as of 'Date'): yes!) |
(Do we want tweak descriptions?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== "Should it only be JB projects?" == | == '''"Should it only be JB projects?"''' == | ||
To answer this curious editor's question: | To answer this curious editor's question: | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:AngelXwind|Karen Tsai (angelXwind)]] ([[User talk:AngelXwind|talk]]) 02:22, 21 August 2013 (PDT) | [[User:AngelXwind|Karen Tsai (angelXwind)]] ([[User talk:AngelXwind|talk]]) 02:22, 21 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
== Updated (as of 'Date') == | == '''Updated (as of 'Date')''' == | ||
Given the size of the list I'm questioning the wisdom of having every item in the list using a delta timestamp. | Given the size of the list I'm questioning the wisdom of having every item in the list using a delta timestamp. | ||
Every month, as most dates are accurate to the month, '''every''' Item will need to have it's delta updated. | Every month, as most dates are accurate to the month, '''every''' Item will need to have it's delta updated. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:*Oh yes, switching to absolute dates makes sense! I just lazily started it with relative dates since that was easy to copy-and-paste from GitHub. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 15:13, 28 August 2013 (PDT) | :*Oh yes, switching to absolute dates makes sense! I just lazily started it with relative dates since that was easy to copy-and-paste from GitHub. [[User:Britta|Britta]] ([[User talk:Britta|talk]]) 15:13, 28 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
== '''Descriptions?''' == | |||
Do we really want a short description of each package? | |||
I can see the theoretical use but each projects link should have a readme detailing the product properly and it makes it looks slightly cluttered? | |||
I'd vote no to descriptions, or if everyone else disagrees then at-least moving them the last updated along so it is still the right most column. | |||
[[User:iKy1e|iKy1e]] ([[User talk:iKy1e|talk]]) 23:50, 30 August GMT | |||
Revision as of 22:50, 30 August 2013
"Should it only be JB projects?"
To answer this curious editor's question:
The iPhone Dev Wiki is mostly jailbreak oriented, but there isn't anything that specifically says that only jailbreak-related things can be documented in this wiki.
That being said, The iPhone Dev Wiki itself states that it is "The sum of all human knowledge about jailbroken iOS development," so I think we should still stick with only listing jailbroken FOSS projects.
...That, and the fact that there are very little FOSS iOS apps (and the ones that exist are essentially dead)
Karen Tsai (angelXwind) (talk) 02:22, 21 August 2013 (PDT)
Updated (as of 'Date')
Given the size of the list I'm questioning the wisdom of having every item in the list using a delta timestamp. Every month, as most dates are accurate to the month, every Item will need to have it's delta updated. If we switch now to using absolute dates then we only need the single switch now and then only a single project when one is updated?
iKy1e (talk) 22:23, 28 August GMT
Descriptions?
Do we really want a short description of each package? I can see the theoretical use but each projects link should have a readme detailing the product properly and it makes it looks slightly cluttered? I'd vote no to descriptions, or if everyone else disagrees then at-least moving them the last updated along so it is still the right most column.